Parents vs. Non-Parents in Custody Cases

Parents vs. Non-Parents in Custody Cases



View Our Testimonials >

Custody Cases Involving Non-Parents Filing Against a Biological Parent in Ohio

 

In Ohio, biological parents have a fundamental legal right to the care and custody of their children, a right that is protected by both the state and federal constitutions. However, there are circumstances where a non-parent may seek custody of a child, particularly when the biological parents are unable or unwilling to provide adequate care. These cases can be highly complex because courts must balance the rights of the biological parents with the best interests of the child.

 

This page provides an in-depth discussion of how custody cases involving non-parents are handled in Ohio, the legal standards that apply, and how the Ohio Revised Code and relevant case law influence these cases. Whether a grandparent, relative, or another third party is seeking custody of a child, Ohio law provides specific guidelines for these situations.

Parental Rights in Ohio Custody Cases

 

In Ohio, biological parents have a strong presumption in their favor when it comes to custody. This presumption is grounded in both state law and the constitutional principle that parents have a fundamental right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children. Ohio courts generally defer to the rights of biological parents unless there is clear evidence that the parent is unfit or unable to care for the child.

 

Ohio Revised Code § 3109.04 establishes the framework for custody determinations and outlines the factors that courts must consider when determining the best interests of the child. When a non-parent files for custody against a biological parent, they face the significant burden of proving that awarding custody to the biological parent would not be in the child’s best interests.

 

The U.S. Supreme Court case Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), affirmed that biological parents have a constitutionally protected right to make decisions regarding their children’s upbringing. This case established that the state must give deference to a parent’s wishes unless there is evidence that the parent is unfit or that the child’s welfare is at risk.

 

Standing of Non-Parents to File for Custody

 

In Ohio, not just anyone can file for custody of a child. Non-parents must first establish that they have standing—the legal right to bring a custody action. Typically, the non-parent must show that they have a significant relationship with the child or that the child’s well-being is at risk while in the care of the biological parent.

 

Ohio Revised Code § 2151.23 grants juvenile courts jurisdiction over child custody cases, including cases where a non-parent seeks custody. Additionally, Ohio Revised Code § 3109.04(D) allows non-parents to seek custody if it is in the best interests of the child and if the biological parent is unfit or unable to provide care.


Who Can File for Custody as a Non-Parent?

 

Non-parents who may file for custody in Ohio include:

  • Grandparents: Grandparents often seek custody when the biological parents are unable to provide care due to issues such as substance abuse, incarceration, or neglect.



  • Other Relatives: Aunts, uncles, or adult siblings may also file for custody if they have played a significant role in the child’s life or if the child’s parents are absent or unfit.
  • Foster Parents: In some cases, foster parents may seek custody if they have cared for the child for an extended period and believe that it is in the child’s best interests to remain in their care.



  • Other Third Parties: In rare cases, a non-relative such as a close family friend or guardian may seek custody if they can demonstrate a significant relationship with the child and that the biological parents are unfit.


Proving Parental Unfitness or Unsuitability

 

For a non-parent to prevail in a custody case against a biological parent, they must typically prove that the biological parent is unfit or unsuitable to care for the child. Ohio courts are reluctant to terminate or interfere with a biological parent’s rights unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the parent cannot provide a safe and stable environment for the child.



Legal Standard for Parental Unfitness

 

The standard of parental unfitness in Ohio is based on whether the parent can provide proper care for the child and ensure their physical and emotional well-being. According to Ohio Revised Code § 2151.414, which governs the termination of parental rights in dependency cases, a court must consider factors such as:

Chronic neglect or abuse: Evidence that the child has been neglected or abused by the parent, as defined by Ohio Revised Code § 2151.03 (neglect) and § 2151.031 (abuse).

Incarceration: If the parent is incarcerated and unable to care for the child for an extended period.



Substance abuse: If the parent has a history of substance abuse that impairs their ability to provide for the child’s basic needs.

Abandonment: If the parent has abandoned the child by failing to maintain contact or provide support for a significant period, as outlined in Ohio Revised Code § 2151.011(C).

Mental health issues: If the parent suffers from a mental illness that affects their ability to care for the child or make appropriate decisions for the child’s welfare.

Domestic violence: If the parent has a history of domestic violence, either against the child or another family member.

In cases where a parent is found to be unfit, the court may award custody to the non-parent if it determines that doing so is in the best interests of the child.


Ohio Case Law on Parental Unfitness

 

Ohio case law has clarified the standards for determining parental unfitness in custody cases. In In re Perales, 52 Ohio St.2d 89 (1977), the Ohio Supreme Court held that a non-parent seeking custody must show that the parent is unsuitable, meaning that placing the child with the parent would be detrimental to the child’s welfare. The court in Perales emphasized that biological parents have a fundamental right to custody of their children, but this right can be overridden if the parent is unfit or unsuitable.

 

Similarly, in In re Hockstock, 98 Ohio St.3d 238 (2002), the Ohio Supreme Court reiterated that in custody disputes between a parent and non-parent, the non-parent must show by clear and convincing evidence that the parent is unsuitable. The court ruled that the mere fact that a non-parent may provide a better environment for the child is insufficient to deprive a parent of custody; rather, there must be evidence of parental unfitness or detriment to the child.

Best Interests of the Child Standard

 

Even when a non-parent establishes that the biological parent is unfit, Ohio courts must still determine whether awarding custody to the non-parent is in the child’s best interests. The best interests of the child standard is codified in Ohio Revised Code § 3109.04(F) and is used in all custody determinations.

 

The court will consider the following factors when deciding what custody arrangement serves the child’s best interests:

  • The child’s wishes

    If the child is mature enough to express a preference, the court may consider their wishes regarding custody.


  • The child’s relationship with each parent and the non-parent

    The court will evaluate the child’s bond with the biological parent and the non-parent to determine which environment is more stable and supportive.

  • The child’s adjustment to home, school, and community

    The court will consider how well the child is doing in their current living situation and whether changing custody would disrupt their stability.

  • The mental and physical health of all parties

    The court will assess whether the parent or non-parent is able to provide for the child’s physical and emotional needs.

  • Any history of abuse, neglect, or domestic violence

    If there is evidence that the child has been exposed to abuse or domestic violence, the court will consider this in determining the best interests of the child.

  • The parent’s willingness to facilitate a relationship with the non-parent

    If the biological parent is unwilling to allow the child to maintain a relationship with the non-parent, the court may consider whether this would negatively impact the child’s well-being.

Procedural Steps for Non-Parent Custody Cases in Ohio

 

When a non-parent seeks custody of a child, the legal process typically involves several key steps:

 Filing a Custody Complaint or Motion

 

The first step is for the non-parent to file a complaint or motion for custody in the appropriate Ohio court, typically the juvenile court or domestic relations court, depending on the circumstances of the case. The complaint must outline the reasons why the non-parent believes custody should be awarded to them instead of the biological parent.

 

The complaint should include:

  • Evidence of the biological parent’s unfitness or inability to care for the child.
  • An explanation of the non-parent’s relationship with the child and why awarding custody to the non-parent is in the child’s best interests.



Service of Process

 

The non-parent must serve the biological parent with the custody complaint, giving them the opportunity to respond and present their case. Service of process ensures that both parties have a fair chance to participate in the custody proceedings. 




Preliminary Hearings and Temporary Orders

 

In some cases, the court may issue temporary custody orders while the case is pending, especially if there are immediate concerns about the child’s safety. Temporary custody orders allow the non-parent to assume responsibility for the child while the court conducts a full investigation and hearing.




Guardian Ad Litem (GAL)

 

The court may appoint a guardian ad litem (GAL) to represent the child’s best interests in the custody proceedings. The GAL’s role is to conduct an independent investigation and provide the court with a recommendation regarding custody. The GAL will interview the child, the parents, and other relevant parties, and will present their findings to the court.

 


Full Custody Hearing

 

At the full custody hearing, both the non-parent and the biological parent will have the opportunity to present evidence, call witnesses, and argue their case. The court will consider all relevant factors, including the parent’s fitness and the best interests of the child, before making a final custody determination.


Legal Consequences of Custody Awards to Non-Parents

 

If the court awards custody to a non-parent, the biological parent may lose their legal right to make decisions about the child’s upbringing, including education, healthcare, and religious matters. However, the biological parent may still retain visitation rights, unless the court finds that such visitation would not be in the child’s best interests.

 

Non-parent custody awards can be temporary or permanent, depending on the circumstances of the case. In some cases, custody may be revisited if the biological parent can demonstrate that they have addressed the issues that led to the initial custody award.

 

Custody cases involving non-parents filing against biological parents in Ohio are complex and require careful legal analysis. While biological parents have a fundamental right to the care and custody of their children, Ohio law allows non-parents to seek custody in cases where the parent is unfit or unable to provide proper care. Courts must balance the parents’ rights with the best interests of the child and consider all relevant factors before making a custody determination.


At Parks Legal, we have extensive experience representing clients in non-parent custody cases.


Whether you are a grandparent, relative, or another third party seeking custody of a child, or a biological parent defending your parental rights, we can provide the legal guidance and support you need.


Contact us at to schedule a consultation and learn more about how we can assist you in navigating Ohio’s custody laws.


Need More Guidance?

Share by: